Beauty School Directory Blog

On Indiana’s proposed cosmetology deregulations and why that’s a terrible idea

Posted on: January 13th, 2012 by Beauty Schools Directory 6 Comments

UPDATE: There’s a petition now for those who want to sign it.

Of course, those of us at Beauty Schools Marketing Group keep a close eye on beauty news. It’s important to us to know what’s going on in the industry, and that doesn’t just mean hairstyle trends. It also means trends in state regulations – or, in all actuality, deregulations.

Two states recently – Indiana and New Hampshire – have introduced legislation to their respective houses calling for the deregulation of state licensing for several occupations, including cosmetology and barbering. New Hampshire’s House defeated the bill on Jan. 5th, but Indiana House Bill 1006 is still in contention. A public hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, Jan. 17th.

Supporters of the bill claim that it should be up to consumers to find qualified professionals in all of the fields that they argue should be deregulated. In Indiana, the report by the commissioned board states:

“If a consumer receives bad service, the consumer can choose a different cosmetologist or barber next time, without any significant risk of irreversible harm … consumers can protect themselves through the standard practice of trial and error.”

Here’s where we take a deep, soothing breath – and then firmly draw the line.

We understand that times are tough right now. We understand that federal and state governments are under a lot of pressure to find areas where they can cut expenditures, and we can see how they might think that this is a good opportunity to do that.

But we adamantly disagree.

We can’t speak for any of the other professions, but by deregulating the cosmetology and beauty industry, the state would be opening up a Pandora’s Box worth of trouble. Maybe it’s been awhile since any members of the commission got anything more than a trim, but there’s a LOT more involved in training and certifying cosmetologists and barbers than making sure they know which end of the scissors is the pointy end.

Without regulations, without some minimum standards of education and training and knowledge, anyone who thinks they’re good with a curling iron could open up a salon. And that could lead to terrible and dangerous consequences for consumers.

Cosmetologists work with chemicals and procedures that, if used incorrectly, can damage skin with burns and scars or cause hair loss, either of which can be long-term or even permanent and would certainly erode the victim’s self-esteem.

With that in mind, let’s look at that statement from the report again: Yes, Indiana commission, we consider this to be both a “significant risk” and the potential for “irreversible harm.” It is NOT something that the “standard practice of trial and error” can protect consumers from nor should it be their job to worry that the person holding the bleach knows how to use it correctly on their hair and not their scalp.

Is certification and licensure a prevent-all? No. But we argue that it prevents a lot of potential trouble, gives salon-goers in the state a little peace of mind, and holds Indiana cosmetologists and barbers to a standard that their clients deserve.

We’ve made our opinion known – what do you guys think? Vote in our poll or let us know in the comments.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Incoming search terms:

About

Heather Physioc is the Website Manager for Beauty Schools Directory and is passionate about all things pertaining to the cosmetology field. Heather specializes in helping aspiring beauty school students find the perfect cosmetology schools to meet their needs. Add Heather on Google+. Beauty Schools Directory is the premier source of listings for cosmetology schools, beauty schools, esthetics schools and other beauty education centers throughout the United States and Canada. Find a Cosmetology School Near You

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

6 Responses

  1. Sabrenda Williams says:

    I think this is the most outrageous thing I have ever heard to have some untrained non licensed person doing these services is ludicrous. These perfessions work with dangerous chemicals and machines imagine what damage this could do to someone if you don’t know what you are doing. This must NEVER happen!

  2. JoAnn Nicholls says:

    Oh, I see, you only post comments that agree with you eh? Wouldn’t post my comment from yesterday huh???

    • JoAnn, because of the incredible amount of attempted spam/phishing comments this blog gets, and because sometimes people put very personal information like phone numbers and addresses in their posts, ALL comments are queued for review before publication. Your comment WAS, in fact, approved yesterday because it was not spam.

      I’m sorry it wasn’t live the moment you posted your comment, but we get a LOT of comments and have a LOT to go through, and this is a very common practice on most blogs on the web to keep spammy robot comments from making it on the site. I hope you will continue to read and comment on as much of our content as you want. It’s nice to have opposing viewpoints with a stake in the industry.

      • Belinda says:

        Oh, JoAnn, I saw your reply ……..what do you do for a living? Because I bet it requires so skill….even Walmart door greeters have a skill ( not everyone is happy to greet strangers)
        This box is too small to explain why it is important for regulations & standards.
        But if it happens – those that stat they are schooled,etc…. Will probably be more successful than those not….

  3. Clee R Oliver says:

    Indiana is looking AGAIN of deregulating the Beauty Culture (cosmetologist & barbers) occupation. HB 520 introduced on Jan. 14, 2013 could do just that. My wife has been doing hair for 30+ years, is an instructor, stylist, and previous owner. I know what she does and goes through to keep up on the industry, i.e., training, and continued schooling.

  4. Clee R Oliver says:

    Please change that bill number to SB 520 (Senate Bill)

Leave a Reply